Difference between revisions of "Reading Research Tips"
(Created page with '==TABLE 1== ===Hints for Reading an Academic Paper=== # Read the abstract, introduction and conclusion to determine the question being asked and why that question is important. ...') |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
##Examine the results of the primary test. Are the results consistent with the researcher's explanation? | ##Examine the results of the primary test. Are the results consistent with the researcher's explanation? | ||
##Are the stated conclusions consistent with the results? Does the narrative discussion make unjustified claims about the usefulness of the study? | ##Are the stated conclusions consistent with the results? Does the narrative discussion make unjustified claims about the usefulness of the study? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | {|style="width:100%;margin-top:+.7em;" | ||
+ | |-align="center" | ||
+ | ! style="background:#fafaFe; color:black; height: 20px" | <small>[[Main Page]] ► [[What is accounting research?]] ► [[Reading Research Tips]]</small> | ||
+ | |} |
Latest revision as of 13:05, 21 February 2011
TABLE 1
Hints for Reading an Academic Paper
- Read the abstract, introduction and conclusion to determine the question being asked and why that question is important.
- Decide whether the question is interesting or important.
- Make note of the important aspects of the paper (research question, method, etc.) for reference while reading the rest of the paper.
- Read the literature review and examine the bibliography to determine the position of the paper.
- Read the sample selection, method, and results sections of the paper to determine its validity:
- What category of study is it?
- If it is an experiment, what steps did the researcher take to improve external validity?
- If it is a quasi- or non-experiment, what steps did the researcher take to improve internal validity?
- Did the researcher carefully design the study to capitalize on the natural strengths of the category of study?
- Do the variables really capture the constructs the researcher claims they capture? Is there a more appropriate variable?
- What limitations does the researcher point out?
- After assessing validity, consider the conclusions made by the researcher.
- Examine the results of the primary test. Are the results consistent with the researcher's explanation?
- Are the stated conclusions consistent with the results? Does the narrative discussion make unjustified claims about the usefulness of the study?
Main Page ► What is accounting research? ► Reading Research Tips |
---|