Difference between revisions of "Talk:BYU Alumni and Friends"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What do you think of the name? Is there a better name to use than "Our People"? Maybe, "Friends of BYU"? The problem with both of them is that they create exclusions (i.e. there are some people who are NOT "our people" or not "friends of BYU") [[User:Kurt Gee|Kurt Gee]] 04:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC) | What do you think of the name? Is there a better name to use than "Our People"? Maybe, "Friends of BYU"? The problem with both of them is that they create exclusions (i.e. there are some people who are NOT "our people" or not "friends of BYU") [[User:Kurt Gee|Kurt Gee]] 04:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Good question. There is no easy solution. What about "BYU Alumni and Friends" I think that is pretty close to accurate. [[User:Daw44|Daw44]] 05:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
− | + | What do you think about adding a "research methodology" section (or primary/secondary?). Any other information that would be nice to have in the table? [[User:Daw44|Daw44]] 05:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC) | |
− |
Revision as of 22:03, 21 January 2011
What do you think of the name? Is there a better name to use than "Our People"? Maybe, "Friends of BYU"? The problem with both of them is that they create exclusions (i.e. there are some people who are NOT "our people" or not "friends of BYU") Kurt Gee 04:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Good question. There is no easy solution. What about "BYU Alumni and Friends" I think that is pretty close to accurate. Daw44 05:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
What do you think about adding a "research methodology" section (or primary/secondary?). Any other information that would be nice to have in the table? Daw44 05:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC)