Difference between revisions of "NCAA Tournament Simulated Using Accounting Research Rankings"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | This is what the 2010 NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship would look like if the winner of each game was the program with the most productive accounting researchers over the last 6 years (i.e., the faculty that has produced the most journal articles in the journals included in the study). | + | This is what the 2010 NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship would look like if the winner of each game was the program with the most productive accounting researchers over the last 6 years (i.e., the faculty that has produced the most journal articles in the journals included in the study). For complete [http://www.byuaccounting.net/rankings/ accounting rankings] visit the companion website (rankings include [http://www.byuaccounting.net/rankings/ University Accounting Rankings] and [http://www.byuaccounting.net/rankings/phdrank/phdrankings.php Ph.D. accounting rankings]). |
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Image:AccountingNCAA.JPG]] | [[Image:AccountingNCAA.JPG]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 06:15, 12 May 2010
This is what the 2010 NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship would look like if the winner of each game was the program with the most productive accounting researchers over the last 6 years (i.e., the faculty that has produced the most journal articles in the journals included in the study). For complete accounting rankings visit the companion website (rankings include University Accounting Rankings and Ph.D. accounting rankings).
