Difference between revisions of "Talk:Experimental Financial"
(New page: So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page. For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' abo...) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page. For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' about the economic and psychological motivations. In this way, the page would more resemble the information shown on the Archival Financial page. Any objections/counter points to this approach? [[ | + | So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page. For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' about the economic and psychological motivations. In this way, the page would more resemble the information shown on the Archival Financial page. Any objections/counter points to this approach? |
| + | : I say go for it. I do think it is important to highlight the difference in experimental economics and JDM type research methodologies. See what you can come up with and then we'll take a look! [[User:Daw44|Daw44]] 09:39, 29 January 2009 (MST) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:03, 22 February 2011
So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page. For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' about the economic and psychological motivations. In this way, the page would more resemble the information shown on the Archival Financial page. Any objections/counter points to this approach?
- I say go for it. I do think it is important to highlight the difference in experimental economics and JDM type research methodologies. See what you can come up with and then we'll take a look! Daw44 09:39, 29 January 2009 (MST)
