Difference between revisions of "Talk:Winners of the NCAA basketball picking contest"
(Undo revision 3412 by 89.149.197.204 (Talk) SPAM) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I think it already is weighted...obviously those who know the most about basketball score the lowest, that is the only reason I can see why I did so poorly!!! It will be fine to see what happens over the next couple years to see if this is random or some people have superior picking abilities. | I think it already is weighted...obviously those who know the most about basketball score the lowest, that is the only reason I can see why I did so poorly!!! It will be fine to see what happens over the next couple years to see if this is random or some people have superior picking abilities. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Should we delete this page? [[User:Kurt Gee|Kurt Gee]] 23:10, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:10, 16 February 2011
I think we should also somehow weight the results for interest and knowledge of basketball. This may yeild a more interesting winner.
I don't think so Jeff.
What? Come on.
I think it already is weighted...obviously those who know the most about basketball score the lowest, that is the only reason I can see why I did so poorly!!! It will be fine to see what happens over the next couple years to see if this is random or some people have superior picking abilities.
Should we delete this page? Kurt Gee 23:10, 16 February 2011 (UTC)