Difference between revisions of "NCAA Tournament Simulated Using Accounting Research Rankings"

From Phdwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is what the 2010 NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship would look like if the winner of each game was the program with the most productive accounting researchers over the last 6 years (i.e., the faculty that has produced the most journal articles in the journals included in the studies).  Rankings are taken from [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1337755 Coyne, Summers, Williams, and Wood (2010)] paper forthcoming in ''Issues in Accounting Education.''
+
This is what the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship would look like if the winner of each game was the program with the most productive accounting researchers over the last 6 years (i.e., the faculty that has produced the most journal articles in the journals included in the study).  For complete [http://www.byuaccounting.net/rankings/ accounting rankings] visit the companion website (rankings include [http://www.byuaccounting.net/rankings/ University Accounting Rankings] and [http://www.byuaccounting.net/rankings/phdrank/phdrankings.php Ph.D. accounting rankings]).
  
For rankings of the best Ph.D. programs, see [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1574502 Stephens, Summers, Williams, and Wood (2010)] working paper posted on SSRN. 
+
==2015 Simulated Results==
 +
[[Image:NCAA2015.JPG]]
  
 +
 +
==2014 Simulated Results==
 +
[[Image:NCAA2014.JPG]]
 +
 +
 +
==2013 Simulated Results==
 +
[[Image:NCAA2013.JPG]]
 +
 +
 +
==2012 Simulated Results==
 +
[[Image:2012_NCAA_Rankings_Accounting.jpg]]
 +
 +
 +
==2011 Simulated Results==
 +
[[Image:2011 NCAA Bracket Accounting Style JPG.JPG]]
 +
 +
 +
==2010 Simulated Results==
 
[[Image:AccountingNCAA.JPG]]
 
[[Image:AccountingNCAA.JPG]]
 
Note: Rankings differ slightly from the SSRN version in some instances as we have updated all the data and the SSRN paper has not been updated.  The results are based on rankings as of December 31, 2009.
 

Latest revision as of 07:42, 16 March 2015

This is what the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship would look like if the winner of each game was the program with the most productive accounting researchers over the last 6 years (i.e., the faculty that has produced the most journal articles in the journals included in the study). For complete accounting rankings visit the companion website (rankings include University Accounting Rankings and Ph.D. accounting rankings).

2015 Simulated Results

NCAA2015.JPG


2014 Simulated Results

NCAA2014.JPG


2013 Simulated Results

NCAA2013.JPG


2012 Simulated Results

2012 NCAA Rankings Accounting.jpg


2011 Simulated Results

2011 NCAA Bracket Accounting Style JPG.JPG


2010 Simulated Results

AccountingNCAA.JPG